Publisher’s
write-up:
‘Norman
Kross is a career interrogator who has worked covertly in some of the most
dangerous places in the world. He returns to his Los Angeles home contemplating
retirement and coming to terms with his past. He may be a master at unlocking
others’ secrets, but he is blind to the truth of his deteriorating relationship
with his wife, to take on one last assignment, to interrogate a character actor
who may be responsible for the death of a director’s daughter. The secrets he
uncovers are far more terrifying than any battlefield, any windowless room, any
passage in the notebook he feverishly writes in to make sense of what men are
capable of behind their masks.’
The Interrogator’s Notebook is a
psychological thriller novel written by Martin Ott; a poet who has successfully
trespassed into the thriller genre. It features a former army interrogator,
Norman Kross, but doing a much lighter task now, that is teaching. However, he
couldn’t stay away from his profession for too long, as he accepts to do one last assignment, interrogating an actor,
who is suspected by the famous director Owen Arnold, of murdering his daughter
Natasha.
Norman Kross – his unique character was a
highlight of this novel with his seemingly unconventional techniques of
interrogation, his totally messed up personal life, the squabbles with his
father in law, and his complete devotion to his profession. I liked the
introductory pages of every chapter where the Norman narrates his past
experiences and also his approach to interrogation. The balance too, was
proper, and nowhere did I get a feeling where the story regarding his personal
life is merely a sub-plot. The antagonist too was an interesting character, the
actor George Stark, who managed to keep Norman under threat – something which
he had probably never felt, even at Fallujah. The USP of this novel is that it
is straight from the horse’s mouth, with Martin Ott, himself being a former
interrogator and the book that I read, is probably even a collection of his own
experiences – which was suggested, I guess in Lesson 10, where Norman states that if he has to compile his
experiences, it would probably be presented as a fiction. The only significant
drawback I felt was that the pace that was required for a thriller novel wasn’t
present in this plot, although that didn’t in anyway made it dull. For casual
readers, this might not be so easy read; taking a gist of paragraphs after a
couple of glances won’t help you and if you’re intrigued by this review, I
suggest you read this book without skipping a word.
When I came to know that this book was categorised under Psychological Thriller, I was quite
sceptical about the whole thing as the only psychological thriller I’ve read so
far is the famous Russian novel, Crime and Punishment and I was utterly
disappointed with it but this book has helped to dispel that scepticism on this
sub-genre. I had an enjoyable experience reading this book, and I felt that
this was one step ahead of a good book, and therefore, my scale would award The Interrogator’s Notebook a seven on
ten.
Rating
– 7/10
Have
a nice day,
Andy