Publisher’s
write-up:
‘At a
Lahore café, a bearded man converses with an American stranger. He recounts his
unusual tale: of how he once embraced the Western dream – and a Western woman –
and how both betrayed him. And as dusk deepens to dark, the significance of
this seemingly chance meeting becomes abundantly clear…’
Lately, I’ve wanted to read some good
Pakistani writing (the previous being The Death of Sheherzad) since most of
modern Indian writing seems to be of the same genre (editing ancient works and
presenting the same in a different way). So, I stumbled upon this book while
randomly browsing in a bookstore and I found the synopsis to be quite
interesting and also, till I saw the cover of this book, I had no idea that
there was a film based on this. Anyway, this is the background as to how I
picked up this book and I’d come to the review without any further digression.
The story features Changez, a young
Pakistani graduate from Princeton, who is narrating his experiences in US to an
American stranger at a café in Lahore. The protagonist is from a well off
family in Pakistan and gets into a well-paying job in a Wall Street firm. He
falls in love with one of his college mates, Erica, and is also considered a
high performer in his job. It looked like nothing could go wrong in his
American dream and looked well set to assimilate into the American society, but
just then, 9/11 happens, his lover goes mentally unstable over her dead
ex-boyfriend and Changez is in full dilemma – he is part of the same society
that is likely to invade his home any time.
The best part about this book, in my
opinion was the narration; it felt as though Changez was talking to me, the
reader. It is literally narrated in the perspective that someone is actively
talking to you and not like how they show in movies, where somebody starts an
old story and it comes back to reality only when the story is over. Moreover,
the protagonist’s dilemma was brought out very well, by the author where at one
end, he is fully defending the American actions as to how the flaw of an
innocent being persecuted can happen in any country and at the other end, he is
unable to let go off the fact that people at home are worried that they could
be invaded anytime. Moreover, I felt the balance was really good, between his
professional life, personal life and also how the events unfolded after 9/11
and the 2001 Indian Parliament attack leading to the eventual stand-off between
the two countries. Also, if you’re imaginative enough and you have an eye for
finding imagery, you can find a lot in this like how the relationship between
Erica and Changez could be seen like the shaky relationship between US and
Pakistan, where, US does love Pakistan, for various reasons, but has its own
expectations and won’t budge till it is satisfied (similar to how she expected
him to be like her ex). There are several others apart from these in this novel
and I don’t wish to spoil them in my review.
However, my problem with this book is,
there were two things that attracted me into buying this book, the first being
the title and the second being the synopsis. Yes, I agree that he was reluctant
and was caught in a dilemma but he was anything but a fundamentalist. In fact,
he was highly secular and had actually fit into the American society perfectly and
nobody would’ve noticed the difference if not for the colour of his skin and
his name. When I first read 'The Reluctant Fundamentalist', I expected someone with the personality of Maajid Nawaz but then, as aforementioned, Changez was altogether different. Moreover, the number of times the word ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islam’ is mentioned
in the book I believe is countable with your ten fingers and thereby, the cover
page with the crescent, yet again is very highly misleading. The second part
is, that it talked about the betrayal by both, the West and the Western Woman
whereas, if at all there was anything, he betrayed himself, owing to his
dilemma and he already knew what he was getting into, when he got into the
relationship, that despite the death of her boyfriend, she still loves him and
eventually plunges into depression because of that – she never left him owing
to some selfish pursuits. I agree that the latter is something the author could
hardly be blamed for, giving the benefit of doubt that it is from the publisher,
but the title, the author certainly is responsible.
I liked the way the author ended the novel
leaving it open ended and the reader can imagine it in anyway it suits them and
yeah, Changez was a really lovable character so, I naturally assumed an ending
suiting how I saw the characters in the novel but you, as a reader, can end it
in any way you want to. Moreover, for someone from the larger side of the Radcliffe
line, it would be interesting to notice how there is little difference between
the two sides, how someone who goes abroad from either sides behave the same
way, how both sides feel threatened at home by the other side and of course,
the fact that the only difference between the two sides is in fact, just the
Radcliffe line.
While I would have really liked to give
this book a better rating, I would have to say that the title deceived me too
much and I’d stop with saying that it was a good story and give a standard
rating of six.
Rating
– 6/10
Have
a nice day,
Andy
