‘Investigative journalist Oliver Bullough reveals the
obscene dark side of globalised finance, a shadow realm of oligarchs and
gangsters, unimaginable power and zero accountability. It’s a place you are
unlikely to visit, buy you can see its effects everywhere. Just look around.
How did we get here? In the 1950s, a small group of
bankers in London had a clever idea: ‘offshore’, an imaginary zone where money
could flow free. Their breakthrough created a vast reservoir of secret wealth,
one that bends the laws of every nation on Earth in order to protect its
masters.
Thanks to offshore, for the first time thieves could
dream big. They could take everything – which is exactly what they will do, unless
we stop them.’
Moneyland is a
book with the subtitle – Why Thieves & Crooks Now Rule the World & How
to Take it Back, from the investigative journalist Oliver Bullough. Moneyland
is the term the author uses for describing the current financial structure. The
case is built over nineteen chapters in the book as to how in this hypothetical
country sans physical presence, those with money can legally enjoy their
wealth, regardless of its source.
He begins
building the case with Ukraine – and this is taken as the prime example of kleptocracy throughout the book where
corruption is so rampant and still; how their former President Viktor
Yanukovych had large amount of wealth in London. He also describes how even
most basic healthcare services cannot be obtained in Ukraine without bribery. He
then describes the problem in most developing nations in Africa or former
Soviet states as to how; there is extreme inequality with those in power
holding unusual amounts of wealth, all hidden in offshore assets and with
properties all over the world, expensive clothes and watches (for which he
gives the example of Angola), etc. It was an interesting observation he made
that in the Corruption Perception Index from Transparency International; while
countries like Angola or Ukraine have a very low rank, their wealth is stashed
away in UK, Switzerland, Cyprus, etc. who rank very high on the corruption
index and in a way, they are guilty.
He also talks
about how corruption can completely destroy the economic prospects of a country
and criticises Western complacency over developing nations that they would
eventually transform themselves into economies similar to that of the developed
world. However, he explains how it is against the interests of those in power
to be more transparent and so long as they are able to hide their assets, they
prefer maintaining the status quo.
The author
writes about various financial instruments and how they have been misused, be
it the Eurodollar bonds, or the offshore companies in Cayman Islands or Saint
Kitts and Nevis, how even diplomatic
immunity is available for purchase, the misuse of libel laws in London and
so on for if I keep going, I would be listing all the chapters. While I
appreciated the deep research involved in all of these topics – it was evident
considering the sources mentioned at the end of the book; however, I had an
issue with some of the sweeping statements, an example of which I am giving
below:
‘You may have read how millions of dollars have been
sent back to Nigeria, Indonesia, Angola or Kazakhstan, and that is true. But
they represent less than one cent of every dollar that was originally stolen.’ Chapter – Aladdin’s Cave,
Page #13
While I am not defending the record of any of these countries but when
such statements are made in a book of this kind, it must be backed by sources
and number. How many millions went back to the countries (some references are
made in future chapters) and what is his basis for making the less than one cent for every dollar allegation?
He probably has a basis for this claim but I expected a footnote or some such
detail and considering this was something I read in the very first chapter, it
put me off.
I appreciate the author for building the case against corruption and I
could relate to most of the examples considering I lived most of my life in a
country which ranks 78 in the Corruption Perception Index and many
of the problems he cited in Ukraine are very similar. His fundamental basis for
making the case was ‘money could move
borders, but laws do not’ and thus, how the corrupt manage to move their
stolen wealth to countries with favourable laws and exploit the same.
The author admits that there could be genuine reasons to use offshore
accounts to hide their money from vindictive governments but the issue of laws
being different is fundamental to the very fact of us having so many different
jurisdictions in the world. The reason why I am saying jurisdiction instead of
country is because the author explains how within US, they exploit favourable
laws in Nevada making it a de facto tax haven.
The author also cracks down on the ability to purchase passports and while it is true
that many exploit it, it is also a very practical solution in many cases.
Imagine a business person holding a passport and is called for a meeting by the
client; someone holding the right passport just needs a ticket, otherwise, you
need to apply for a visa and prove your credentials and tell your client to
wait till then which simply isn’t practical. The author being someone who holds
a British passport would never be able to understand the pain of a visa
application process; I can even cite a personal example where I once joked with
a HR in one of their random questions – ‘what
would you do if you win a lottery?’ to which I responded that I would
secure a Maltese nationality. Much as I would like to satisfy requirements in a
proper way, if there is a legal alternative available, I would take it in a
heartbeat; a lot of opportunities are denied for the sheer lack of a passport
and thus, several countries are definitely going to offer schemes to overcome
this ridiculous system currently in the world which has no logic whatsoever.
To end the
digression, I would say that I certainly enjoyed reading the book but the
author did mention ‘how to take it back’ and all he did was dedicate one
chapter to it; that too mentioning that he does not have a very clear solution.
I am fine with that, the author I understand is not from a banking / financial
services / legal background and has presented the case well; but in that case,
he should have refrained from promising the sky in the cover page.
To conclude, the
book is informative, and can be read by those who are not finance professionals
as well (no unexplained jargons); and my hint is do not be deceived by the
title. I shall not let what I disagree with on a personal level get in the way
of my review (like the passport issue) and so, I award the book a rating of six
on ten.
Rating
– 6/10
Have
a nice day,
Andy