Publisher’s
write-up:
‘The Unbearable Lightness of Being is a story of
irreconcilable love and infidelities in which Milan Kundera addresses himself
to the nature of twentieth-century ‘Being’, offering a wide range of brilliant
and amusing philosophical speculations. First published in 1984, Kundera’s
masterly novel encompasses extremes of comedy and tragedy and was hailed by
critics as a contemporary classic.’
The Unbearable
Lightness of Being is a narrative written by Milan Kundera which covers various
philosophical aspects such as connection of an individual with their body,
misunderstood words, human relationships and infidelities with a touch of
politics. The political aspect is made interesting by the fact that the plot is
based in the backdrop of a Soviet invasion in Czechoslovakia.
This is based on
two couples during the Soviet era in Czechoslovakia – and 3 of the principal
characters involved are Czech. The story features Tomas, a married man whom I
believe to be anywhere between mid-30s to early 50s as the story progresses. He
is a womaniser and has strong views about love and sex – wherein, he loves his
wife Tereza but at the same time, has multiple sexual partners and sees no
contradiction in this position. Tereza does not object to Tomas’ behaviour and
instead sees it as her own weakness; she herself has strong views and is a
photographer – often involving in dissident photography. Then there is the
character of Sabina who is an artist and Tomas’ mistress and the story mainly
revolves around these three characters.
It is not often
that a book completely gets me gripped within the first twenty pages, but this
was one such book. The fact that I had very little expectations was another
factor – where I have the convention that my souvenir in any place is normally
an English translation of a book from a local author and after a long search
for a book from a Slovak author in Bratislava, I settled for this book
originally written in Czech (from a writer of Czech heritage who prefers be
identified as French).
It started with
a very interesting character – Tomas; and threw in a lot of ideas which are
revolutionary even in today’s time that it was interesting to read. The best
aspect of the book was the complex characters the author built – Tomas and
Sabina with the characteristics as mentioned earlier and Sabina herself, had
very strong views on love and commitment. The story also deals with other
aspects such as homesickness such as homesickness, where Tomas and Tereza
settle in Switzerland and longed to return to Prague despite the regime. Being
someone who enjoys Greek mythology, the allusions to the myth was another
highlight of this book (like the story of Oedipus).
The book had a
proper blend of politics, romance while retaining the philosophical nature of
the book. My bone to pick might be the fact that the author went back in time
so late into the plot; wherein, there is a point where sub-plot involving
Sabina goes way ahead of time and then it returns to the past (which for large
parts of the novel is the present from the reader’s perspective). The book was
also not free from repetition when it came to the repeated mention of destiny
and coincidence – the repeated reference to the Beethoven symphony I felt was
one too many.
This book is an
excellent read unless the reader is a person who already has strong views on a
lot of these subjects where a conflicting view strongly disturbs them. Rather
than just penning down a non-fiction philosophy book, the author has made an
interesting plot with complex characters and political backdrop while sticking
to the larger objective.
On that count, I
would award the book a rating of eight on ten.
Rating
– 8/10
Have
a nice day,
Andy
Andy