Publisher’s
write-up:
‘Shiva
is gathering his forces. He reaches the Naga capital, Panchavati, and Evil is
finally revealed. The Neelkanth prepares for a holy war against his true enemy,
a man whose name instils dread in the fiercest warriors.
India
convulses under the onslaught of a series of brutal battles. It’s a war for the
very soul of the nation. Many will die. But Shiva must not fail, no matter what
the cost. In his desperation, he reaches out to the ones who have never offered
any help to him: the Vayuputras.
Will
he succeed? And what will be the real cost of battling Evil? To India? And to
Shiva’s soul?’
The Oath of the Vayuputras is the final
book in Amish Tripathi’s Shiva Trilogy. This book too, like The Secret of the
Nagas, starts exactly where the prequel stops. So, don’t read this as a stand-alone
before reading The Immortals of Meluha or The Secret of the Nagas, the reviews
of which are available in this blog.
In this, Shiva’s quest for evil is complete
after the reunion with his friend Brahaspati. The reasons for the plague in
Branga, the birth of Nagas, had all been brought to light – and the reason is
what is said to be the greatest invention – the Somras – the potion which
extends the lifespan of a person (I’m not spoiling anything here, it is
revealed within the first 40 pages). Shiva decides that Somras is evil and it
has to be removed from the world. However, he has obstacles in his way – the
actual beneficiary of the potion, the Meluha, doesn’t accept Shiva’s position,
and Shiva himself is seen as he was never nominated by the Vayuputras, a tribe
who were supposed to choose the Neelkanth. War is inevitable, and it has to be
won.
The first thing I could notice in this novel
immediately was that Amish’s writing has improved, A LOT. While the language in
the first was rather amateurish, and in an attempt to make it better, the second
book was highly laboured but the final instalment of the trilogy is natural and
the author has largely stopped using modern slang but I’d reiterate that this
is only a case of improvement and doesn’t necessarily mean that the language
and presentation is noteworthy. Another interesting aspect of it was the global
element of it – if you take a present day political map, the story revolves
around in India, Pakistan, Iran, Bangladesh and Egypt. Coming to the story as
such, the important part of it, the war strategies of both the sides was
brought out well. The characters had become complete now and now the reader can
easily judge the reaction of a character based on her/his personality, which
was one of my major complaints with the first book. I loved the character of
Kali in particular, which was somewhere close to my own line of thought, such
as her open criticism of paramatma (supreme being / god) owing to the
unnecessary suffering of the Nagas for the mistakes of certain Meluhans; I was
immediately reminded of Austin Dacey’s fifth argument in favour of atheism and
against god, that is, ‘The existence of gratuitous / pointless evil and
suffering’. The story got into the crux of the plot, immediately, and that page
was well maintained throughout and the only complaint that people could have
regarding this is that there was no element of mystery involved, unlike the
first two books, nevertheless, it wasn’t devoid of twists and turns. The
allusions that the author makes to the Zoroastrians and the Buddhists was also
quite interesting, something which most could easily relate to.
This book also had its flaws, starting with
Kartik. The kid, I guess, was a six or seven year old at the beginning of this
novel and although it is said that he is a prodigy when it comes to wielding
the sword, no prodigy could even thinking of leading an army of hundred
thousand against a ferocious force. So, his intellectual thoughts and his role are
highly inconsistent with his age. Like in all the other books, the excessive
usage of the ‘respect pronouns’ such as your highness, my lord/lady, etcetera
was quite annoying. The sudden patriotism of Amish was also quite strange,
considering how he had started referring to the land as ‘India’ and similar to
how the author only referred to west Asia as Mesopotamia and not Iran / Iraq is
because these name didn’t exist back then and the same applies for the name, India
as well. While I liked the strategies that were formulated for the war, I was
disappointed with the actual wars, as each of them, were highly one sided,
either in favour of one or the other. Moreover, while the ending was good, but
I don’t think any sensible person would regard Shiva as a great person,
considering what the means he had employed to attain his ends. The author did a
commendable job in covering up most of the loose ends but I found one
significant loose end, that is, the murder of Sati’s deceased husband
Chandhadwaj. The reasons for the same could be presumed by the reader but,
Daksha, while thinking about it personally, comes to a conclusion that he was
party to it, but it happened because of an act of omission on his part although
the reader is kept in the dark as to what was that omission.
Overall, I enjoyed the novel very much,
much more than the previous ones. I don’t consider the Shiva trilogy to be a
series per se, rather, the same book broken into three parts and hence, I’d
also consider working on a review and a concluding summary of the novel, soon,
and the latter would definitely contain spoilers.
The author did suggest his next work
towards the end of the novel – a similar genre, based on Mahabharat. If it
happens, it would not add versatility to his name, but I do understand that it
has the potential to generate a lot more money and I hope he does a good job in
writing that book.
Coming to the rating of this book, although
this is much better than The Secret of the Nagas, the book still doesn’t
deserve a rating of nine. I’d award this an eight on ten.
Rating – 8/10
Have a nice day,
Andy
Dude, this is really good. You definitely can reach out for a bigger readership.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback. You too are an author with executive powers. So, any suggestions to increase the readership?
Delete